The Road Not Taken

My senior year in college, lo these many years ago, I had my path mapped out. I had majored in history, minored in English, and taken all of the courses necessary to get certified to teach high school social studies and English. I’d done my student teaching. I’d gone to educational job fairs, and I’d lined up a job at a school in a small town in coastal South Carolina (conditioned only upon my finishing the paperwork needed to get my SC teaching license, which I planned to do that summer).

And then, over Easter weekend of that year, Penelope dropped by campus out of the blue to visit. We’d been friends forever, but that weekend we became so much more… and as she was headed to Chicago to go to the School of the Art Institute, suddenly my moving to South Carolina was unthinkable. I went to Chicago too late to get my Illinois certification in order in time to find a teaching job that year. I got a job in educational publishing and hated it so much I was soured on the whole educational field, so became a lawyer instead.

I shall be telling this with a sigh

Somewhere ages and ages hence

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I–

I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference.

- Robert Frost

And that has made all the difference, indeed. This is the time of year, every year, when I am most haunted by that road not taken. This is the time of year when my teacher friends (including my darling bride) are cleaning out their classrooms, planning their summer adventures, and posting Facebook updates about how much their students have grown and learned and how bittersweet it is to send them off to the next grade or school or university. (Penelope will be upset if I don’t clarify that she is not posting anything to Facebook, as she is a conscientious Facebook objector.)

Let me be clear: I am not just jealous of the summer vacations. (Penelope doesn’t even have summer vacation: she has a mere ten days off before she starts teaching the extended school year program.) I am certainly not jealous of the mountains of paperwork, tedious meetings, and bureaucratic obstacles teachers have to contend with. (I get plenty of that in my current job, thankyouverymuch.) There is plenty wrong with our nation’s public education system, and there is every chance that if I had taken that other road in the yellow wood, I might have quickly burned out and become embittered.

Here’s what haunts me; what I am, unquestionably, jealous of: the cyclical nature of the teaching profession. Every fall there is the anticipation of a bright new beginning, a new year “with no mistakes in it,” as Anne Shirley would say. -New students, new supplies (I love office supplies with an unhealthy zeal), new grade books, new unit ideas, new lesson plans: all the excitement of the first day of school, every year for one’s entire career! Every school year passes with a predictable rhythm, but always with the opportunity to improve upon the mistakes of the past, and always with new students to guide and influence. Then, every spring brings closure — tangible proof that the work you have done that year made a difference — as students write their final essays or exams and go on to the next stage in their lives, more mature, more intelligent, more skilled, more thoughtful, more inspired than they were when they first entered your classroom. Some of them may even pause on their way out the door to thank you for your part in that transformation.

That closure, that recognition, that sense of accomplishment — these are entirely absent from my work as a prosecutor. (Well, not entirely: I have actually had a handful of defendants thank me for my role in setting them back on the path to righteousness — but that’s a handful among thousands and thousands of cases.) The criminal justice system serves a lot of necessary purposes, but it is woefully inadequate to address many of the issues that lead to criminality: addiction, mental illness, poverty, family violence. In my line of work, “success” means I never see the defendant again — and success by that measure is, regrettably, all too rare. All too often the same faces come through the court room again and again, aging from adolescence to middle adulthood, always with the same issues, stories, and excuses. Most people seem to finally settle down some time in their thirties and stop getting arrested, but not because of anything did, not because of any sentence imposed by a judge: no, they simply grew up.

This time of year, as the teachers are swelling with well-deserved pride at their accomplishments and those of their proteges, I always struggle more than usual to find the value in my work. I heave a great sigh and think of the road not traveled.

-C.

Time to Unplug

Hank and I drove home tonight in a deluge, wipers slapping at their highest speed, rain pounding on the roof and windows, puddles sloshing against the wheel wells. I opted for the back roads rather than the highway so I could take my time, and I’d long since turned off NPR so I could concentrate on getting us safely home.

Hank started talking in the backseat, but against the roaring storm and the road noise, I couldn’t hear him. -And suddenly I caught myself with my thumb on the Volume + button on my steering wheel, trying to turn him up. I was actually trying to turn up the volume on my toddler.

Yes, it could have been worse. I might have been trying to turn him down, or trying to turn up the radio to drown him out. I suppose I can take some comfort in the fact that I was trying to listen to him even in the midst of my white-knuckled driving distraction. But it got me thinking: I now turn to gadgetry to solve every day issues in a way that is so automatic, so reflexive, that I don’t even think about it… and maybe that’s not such a good thing.

“Phone” was one of Hank’s very first words, and he knew how to flip through photos on my iPhone before he knew how to walk. I’m not proud of that. We derive a certain amount of smug satisfaction from living in a TV-free home, but the lack of a TV doesn’t stop us from logging too much screen time. This very instant, I’m blogging at the dinner table while I supervise Hank’s meal. (Penelope’s out at our home inspection tonight: more on that another time.) Penelope is addicted to the New York Times Crossword app on her iPad. I check Facebook on my phone the very instant I wake up, most mornings.

I definitely notice that with all the time I spend plugged in to my various gadgets and digital distractions, the less activity there seems to be going on in my mind, even when I unplug the external noise… and that can’t be a good thing, no ‘maybe’ about it. So while I’m not ready to cut my digital umbilical cord and swear off the internets entirely, I am going to try to seek a better balance. I can’t turn up the volume on my toddler, but maybe if I unplug the noise, I can turn up the volume on my own thoughts.

Wish me luck.

-C.

Earth-Shattering News

Penelope and I are getting our ducks in a row to start trying for baby #2. (Yes, that’s news, but it’s not the earth-shattering news to which the title of this post refers.) A few weeks ago, we called our sperm bank to see if they still had units available for Hank’s donor, so that our kids could be biologically related. (Penelope gave birth to Hank; I will be doing the heavy lifting this time, Lord willin’ and the cricks don’t rise.) When we called the bank, they told us that, though the donor has been inactive for some time, they still have units available for families that already have conceived a baby by that donor… but a genetic “issue” had been reported in a recent birth, and so we would have to talk with the bank’s genetic counselor before placing our order. Of course, it was late on a Friday afternoon, and the counselor had already left for the day, and so Penelope and I were left to wonder and worry all weekend.

The following Monday, I finally spoke to the counselor, who had very little information because the problem had only just been reported to the bank the prior week, and she hadn’t had a chance to research it yet. She told me that a pair of twins had been born with a condition that might or might not be genetic, and it had been corrected by surgery so the twins were fine, and that the bank was trying to interview the mother and her doctors to get more information. She advised me to touch base with her again in a week.

Well, a week passed, and I left the counselor a message. She didn’t call back. The next two days, I e-mailed her. No response. Now, those who know me know I’m an instant-gratification kind of girl: I was not handling this delay. So, for the first time since Hank’s birth, I got curious about the here-to-fore hypothetical families that have also conceived using the same donor. Then, as we all do when curiosity strikes in this information age, I took to the interwebs to see what I could see. The genetic counselor did finally call me back, yesterday afternoon, but in the meantime, here’s what I’d already found out. (Yes, this is the earth-shattering part. Brace yourselves.)

Oh, my. It turns out that our boy is one of (at least) 23 babies born to this donor, between the ages of 3 years and just born, and that those 23 (twenty-three. Twenty!-effing-Three!) babies’ mamas are ORGANIZED. They even have a secret Facebook group. (I didn’t even know Facebook had “secret” groups, but they do: we can share and post things in this group, and it doesn’t show up on any feeds except that of the secret group.) Mere hours after my first tentative web forays, I was added to this secret group, and now I am absolutely swimming in information that is thrilling and fascinating, but for which I am not emotionally prepared. Did I mention that there are twenty-three half-siblings?

I say that the mamas are organized because all of the families that have registered are either lesbian couples with kids or single mothers. There may be other, unreported babies out there in more traditional families, and to me, that makes sense: I can only imagine if I were a father whose kids were conceived by donor sperm, I wouldn’t be that interested in the donor, and I would hope my kids weren’t, either. All of which means, of course, that there may easily be more than twenty-three siblings out there.

The bank’s policy is to retire donors when there are 25-30 family units with live births. (Not 25-30 kids; 25-30 family units. If all 30 families miraculously had twins or multiple babies with the same donor, there could be scores of half-siblings.) I theoretically knew that policy when we chose this bank and this donor, but, trust me, 25-30 families looks a lot different when one considers it in the abstract, when one is trying and hoping and praying to successfully join those 25-30 lucky family units, versus months later when one is raising an amazing little person, and suddenly one has to come to grips with the news that this precious, unique little guy has dozens of half-siblings out there, and most of them have his sculpted eyebrows and funny concave toenails.

Anyway, we’re still grappling with this, and I expect we will be for quite some time. Not just the sheer numbers, but other ramifications, too. How involved do we want to be with this group of moms and siblings, now, or do we want to pull back until Hank is of an age where he can make that decision himself? (To be honest, I’m not sure that’s even an option: now that I know these people exist, I can’t un-ring that bell.) If we stay connected with these families, how connected: will we want to meet them? How often? How would we afford that? They’re all over the country. There is so much to think about.

Oh, and yes, the mom with the twins with the genetic condition? She’s in the Facebook group. Her boys are fine–gorgeous, actually. They have Hank’s eyebrows.

-C